To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 22:15
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 157
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 622
55% 468 Pts
64-Core 1442
89% 1442 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 120GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1206A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 356 347 363 391 374 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 447
Write 395
Mixed 355
SusWrite 355
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 5.2
47% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 69.1
DQ Write 21
DQ Mixed 20.5
22% 36.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 93%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 232 209 213 224 221 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 114%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
858GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 13 17 20 15 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
9.64% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 13.5
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 17
12% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.1
41% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.64%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351V7BMR4C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.6% Good
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 30
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.8
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 60 27" 1280 720 XMI2701 Mi Monitor
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback