Lenovo 30BA00HBUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30BA00HBUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1037
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '21 at 19:43
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4210R
CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 70
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 190
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 723
65% 550 Pts
64-Core 2,435
151% 2,435 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
Nvidia(10DE 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.56
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 20.2
18% 23.3 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 22
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,415
Write 1,332
Mixed 1,023
280% 1,257 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 35.2
124% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 556
DQ Write 756
DQ Mixed 633
485% 648 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 380%
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 4M2QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1975
Write 1862
Mixed 1,588
403% 1,808 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 57.8
201% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 789
DQ Write 606
DQ Mixed 729
536% 708 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 380%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 372
Mixed 42.8
151% 208 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
353% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 161%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7DJR8N-WM 2x16GB
2 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.8% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 8.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30BA00HBUS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Lenovo 30BA00HBUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback