Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '21 at 14:51
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$150 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Memory 93.7 1-Core 143 2-Core 276 95% 171 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 849 86% 698 Pts	64-Core 1,119 69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.7% Above average	Lighting 65.9 Reflection 63.5 Parallax 89.3 54% 72.9 fps	MRender 62.7 Gravity 70.1 Splatting 47.3 48% 60 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 661GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 177 175 175 181 175 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 492 Mixed 474 SusWrite 178 93% 416 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 59.1 196% 68.9 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 354 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 224GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 252 249 250 224 250 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 493 Mixed 425 SusWrite 242 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 62.2 210% 73.8 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 356 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$108 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 335GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 254 252 252 259 252 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 335 Mixed 422 SusWrite 255 85% 382 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 51.4 181% 67.2 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 354 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 121%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 133GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 178 175 175 181 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 493 Mixed 424 SusWrite 180 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 61.5 208% 73 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 354 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 166GB free Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 213 227 228 231 229 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 466 Write 258 Mixed 262 SusWrite 224 67% 303 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 16 110% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 22.9 67% 142 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 74%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 189GB free Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 176 174 174 179 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	71% Very good	Read 505 Write 246 Mixed 264 SusWrite 174 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 99 4K Mixed 15.9 108% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 23.6 66% 140 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 74%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 8GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 1040 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6 5.7 6 6.1 5.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	6.72% Terrible	Read 25.1 Write 2.7 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 5.8 10% 9.78 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.72% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 8x4GB 247 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2731 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	MC Read 49.5 MC Write 48.1 MC Mixed 49.8 140% 49.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 25.6 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 66%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	225x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	86x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	39x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	38x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	26x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GBKingstonBench 90%, 4,583 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $115Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	10x
BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 4x8GBCrucialBench 107%, 871 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $1,100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16