MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 22:17
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 90.5
1-Core 17.4
2-Core 33.3
38% 47.1 Pts
4-Core 58.8
8-Core 92.1
9% 75.4 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,195
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 143
Parallax 315
116% 200 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 143
Splatting 143
117% 143 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 113%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
32GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 319 318 318 317 316 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 493
Write 443
Mixed 444
SusWrite 336
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 9.5
59% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 208
134% 154 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 586 596 605 617 623 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,430
Write 2,229
Mixed 1,444
SusWrite 655
377% 1,689 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 96.3
326% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,030
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 785
573% 763 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 272%
Great: 340%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
918GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 185 183 181 189 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 134
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 187
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 108%
Great: 103%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3.3
6% 6.48 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GISB CL16-18-18 D4-3200 F4-3000C16-8GISB CL16-18-18 D4-3200 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 16.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 16.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 41%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $984
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback