Asrock X299 Taichi CLX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X299 Taichi CLX  (all builds)
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 16:36
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900X-$620
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 68.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,152
102% 864 Pts
64-Core 1,897
117% 1,897 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 190
Parallax 140
123% 160 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 138
Splatting 112
114% 144 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 116%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1141 897 886 868 876 871 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,190
Write 2,106
Mixed 1,695
SusWrite 923
387% 1,729 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 88.8
296% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,122
DQ Write 852
DQ Mixed 1,017
752% 997 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 280%
Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
97GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 477 478 478 478 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 468
Mixed 456
SusWrite 478
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 56.1
188% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
92GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 478 478 478 478 376 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 470
Mixed 455
SusWrite 461
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 55.6
188% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
86GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 478 478 478 478 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 468
Mixed 454
SusWrite 476
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 55.7
188% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKKW512G8 512GB
172GB free
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 906 555 556 557 553 555 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,335
Write 1,142
Mixed 1,269
SusWrite 614
296% 1,340 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 83.1
284% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,013
DQ Write 858
DQ Mixed 953
709% 942 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 261%
Great: 282%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 46.5
MC Mixed 29.6
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 8.8
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 Taichi CLX Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 172%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Taichi CLX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $879
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback