Novatech PC-2517

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 212%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics235% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNovatech PC-2517  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO-CF
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 12:57
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 274
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1123
103% 860 Pts
64-Core 1,174
73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
EVGA(3842 3982) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Lighting 359
Reflection 306
Parallax 360
292% 342 fps
MRender 379
Gravity 271
Splatting 195
221% 282 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 235%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,215
Write 2,016
Mixed 1412
418% 1,881 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 76.9
272% 95.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1009
DQ Write 1,283
DQ Mixed 1,159
871% 1,150 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1TB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 487 486 487 487 487 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 485
Mixed 391
SusWrite 486
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 48.5
163% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PC-2517 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 197%
UFO

System: Novatech PC-2517

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,807
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback