Asus TUF GAMING H570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING H570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 11:38
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900-$280
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 74.5
1-Core 155
2-Core 299
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 984
96% 790 Pts
64-Core 1,473
91% 1,473 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 87F6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 114
Parallax 126
107% 124 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 104
Splatting 89.9
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2093 2717 2355 818 911 792 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,820
Write 2,870
Mixed 1,931
SusWrite 1,614
466% 2,059 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 40.6
171% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,209
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 24.5
274% 658 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 266%
Great: 486%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
269GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 428 420 424 429 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 409
Mixed 378
SusWrite 418
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 38.6
126% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 277
227% 323 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 125%
Kingston SSDNow KC300 240GB-$58
141GB free
Firmware: 526ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 210 171 194 196 225 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 324
Write 256
Mixed 246
SusWrite 197
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 32.8
108% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 267
194% 253 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 94%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
808GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1829 1779 1700 1572 1706 1704 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,494
Write 2,010
Mixed 1408
SusWrite 1,715
375% 1,657 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 42.5
138% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,136
DQ Write 894
DQ Mixed 669
594% 900 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 252%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 21.2
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 26.5
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING H570-PRO Builds (Compare 468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING H570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback