Asus TUF GAMING H570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING H570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 11:24
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900-$280
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 74.7
1-Core 155
2-Core 280
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 959
92% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,556
96% 1,556 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 87F6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 114
Parallax 126
106% 124 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 104
Splatting 88.9
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2007 2747 2610 890 945 834 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 1,723
Write 2,882
Mixed 1,950
SusWrite 1,672
466% 2,057 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 63.7
203% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,197
DQ Write 803
DQ Mixed 23.6
281% 674 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 279%
Great: 486%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
269GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 430 401 375 422 392 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 365
Mixed 312
SusWrite 401
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 35.8
115% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 282
228% 324 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 125%
Kingston SSDNow KC300 240GB-$58
141GB free
Firmware: 526ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 210 182 215 228 218 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 355
Write 262
Mixed 273
SusWrite 212
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 32.1
115% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 262
194% 256 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 94%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
808GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1678 1699 1752 1641 1611 1727 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,464
Write 2,076
Mixed 1,493
SusWrite 1,685
380% 1,679 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 35.8
133% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 1,141
DQ Write 856
DQ Mixed 578
546% 858 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 246%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 21.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 26.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING H570-PRO Builds (Compare 468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING H570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback