Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 04:01
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 182
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 599
61% 494 Pts
64-Core 774
48% 774 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Asus(1043 0470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.9% Average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 69.3
Parallax 84.3
52% 72.4 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 57.4
Splatting 43.7
43% 54 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 68 62 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 317
Write 313
Mixed 291
SusWrite 70.1
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 25.8
82% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 216
135% 144 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 121%
OCZ AGILITY4 512GB
229GB free
Firmware: 1.5.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 189 180 182 191 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.3% Average
Read 236
Write 190
Mixed 150
SusWrite 185
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 19.2
68% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 181
133% 172 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
90GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 76 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 87.2
Write 81.5
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 75.1
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
151GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 100 86 97 90 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 90
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 90.6
66% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 76%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 4.5 4.2 4.8 4.2 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Read 26
Write 16.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.9
14% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 10%
Generic Ultra HS-SD/MMC 32GB
14GB free, PID 4064
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 19.9
Write 18.3
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 19.6
26% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.3
220% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
USB Flash Memory 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 5.4 8.5 9 8.5 9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Read 21.1
Write 8.7
Mixed 6
SusWrite 7.3
12% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 45.7
MC Write 44.3
MC Mixed 40.8
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $534
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback