Base_board_manufacturer MODEL_NAME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemBase_board_manufacturer MODEL_NAME  (all builds)
MotherboardEVGA 132-SE-E775
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 07:03
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 100
2-Core 201
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 485
50% 405 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 176
Parallax 174
139% 174 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 151
Splatting 131
125% 157 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 322 432 443 437 431 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 448
Mixed 338
SusWrite 373
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 31.5
122% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 294
240% 342 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Dimm0_Manufacturer Dimm0_ Dimm2_Manufacturer Dimm2_ 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MODEL_NAME Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

System: Base_board_manufacturer MODEL_NAME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback