Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 115% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210201
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '21 at 01:42
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 68.7 1-Core 148 2-Core 296 90% 171 Pts	4-Core 593 8-Core 1147 103% 870 Pts	64-Core 1,505 93% 1,505 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% EVGA(3842 3173) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Lighting 157 Reflection 155 Parallax 154 128% 155 fps	MRender 191 Gravity 136 Splatting 119 118% 148 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 357GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1455 884 878 883 884 881 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	307% Outstanding	Read 2,666 Write 2,573 Mixed 1,897 SusWrite 978 454% 2,028 MB/s	4K Read 68.9 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 94.1 310% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,174 DQ Write 799 DQ Mixed 1,003 744% 992 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 307% Great: 346%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 81GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 309 294 296 306 294 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 454 Write 261 Mixed 270 SusWrite 303 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 27 102% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 86.8 DQ Mixed 129 98% 134 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 86%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$78 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 135 138 135 136 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 136 Write 131 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 136 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 86%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 140 138 141 141 141 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Read 133 Write 91.9 Mixed 80.4 SusWrite 138 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 187% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 118 115 115 120 116 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 118 Write 90.9 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 115 71% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 83%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: CC51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 133 133 133 134 133 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 143 Write 112 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 132 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 96%
SMI USB DISK 252GB 170 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 22GB free, PID null, microcenter SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 73 80 78 77 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 94.5 Write 118 Mixed 98.7 SusWrite 77.4 134% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 3.8 242% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.3% Good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 27.5 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 27.7 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,687x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $179Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,316x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,450x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,262x
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,089x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,477x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,853x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,111x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $142Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	869x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	776x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	733x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $120Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	650x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48