MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 76%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '21 at 06:10
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 198
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 380
50% 378 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Zotac(19DA 1294) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.46% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 11.8
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kuijia DK500/120G 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1130A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 253 256 256 258 257 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 472
Write 247
Mixed 277
SusWrite 256
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 25.9
133% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 71.6
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 35.6
62% 116 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 18.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-P33 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 5,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 23%
Desktop 72%
Workstation 18%

Motherboard: MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817) - $73

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback