bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DP67DE
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '21 at 23:38
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 174
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 337
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 332
20% 332 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 83F4) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FTM24N325H 240GB
135GB free
Firmware: S0719A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 341 187 105 99 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 473
Write 406
Mixed 369
SusWrite 200
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 24.7
99% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 46.2
99% 199 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 89%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07985
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 428 430 418 425 426 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 62%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
795GB free, PID ab26
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 123 119 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 86.4
Write 93.5
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 121
131% 94 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback