Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201014
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '21 at 17:41
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9800E APU (2016 M.BR) 768 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Memory 41.1 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 132 44% 80.7 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 203 27% 203 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Lighting 38.7 Reflection 43.6 Parallax 44.5 32% 42.3 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 40.6 Splatting 29.4 29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 358 361 367 368 369 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 432 Write 367 Mixed 292 SusWrite 356 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 34.5 113% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 258 210% 300 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 882GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 178 174 172 176 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 169 Mixed 102 SusWrite 174 114% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB 4,860 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.2% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 14 36% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 9.9 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,469x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,308x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,008x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	953x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	736x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	656x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	717x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	340x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	286x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	294x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	227x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $354

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16