PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
Memory | 6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20201014 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 03 '21 at 16:18 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A12-9800E APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
48.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 364 362 368 370 369 MB/s
|
98.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
884GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 178 172 174 179 177 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,467x |
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,308x |
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,008x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 952x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 736x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 655x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $354 |