HP 87F5____

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 87F5____  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87F5
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200515
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 10 '21 at 15:38
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 217
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 406
45% 353 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 87F5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 16
12% 16.3 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 12
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.53 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel HBRPEKNX0202AH 512GB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 813 827 648 57 163 146 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 24.1
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 14.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback