Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 10 '21 at 10:12
Run Duration3474 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 228
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 669
62% 520 Pts
64-Core 887
55% 887 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 9.1
6% 8.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 128GB 128GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 195 179 224 346 362 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,252
Write 447
Mixed 531
SusWrite 266
137% 624 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 17.8
141% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 398
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 321
274% 398 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 126%
Great: 170%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1384 1187 1122 1094 1162 1179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,430
Write 1,203
Mixed 1,150
SusWrite 1,188
279% 1,243 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 71.5
212% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,202
DQ Write 1,139
DQ Mixed 1,183
885% 1,175 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 249%
Great: 435%
Seagate ST300MP0005 300GB
131GB free
Firmware: N002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 71 46 28 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 43.2
Write 10.7
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 45.9
31% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST300MP0005 300GB
104GB free
Firmware: N002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 42 59 38 55 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 80.8
Write 37.3
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 48.4
46% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.4
295% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST300MP0005 300GB
143GB free
Firmware: N002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 28 66 45 39 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 85.3
Write 40.4
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 50
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.2
154% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST300MP0005 300GB
112GB free
Firmware: N002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 54 24 42 67 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 98.2
Write 49.8
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 40.8
39% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST300MP0005 300GB
80GB free
Firmware: N002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 33 59 46 37 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 62.7
Write 51.7
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 43.9
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
237% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST300MP0005 300GB
80GB free
Firmware: N002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 52 32 36 64 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 162
Write 73
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 41.3
67% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST300MP0005 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: N002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 74 74 78 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 170
Write 75.5
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 77.3
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.3
290% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CM4X8GD3000C15K4 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.1% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 9.7
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $430
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback