Asus G73Jw

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus G73Jw (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G73Jw
Memory	1.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110127
Uptime	11.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '21 at 08:55
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63% Good	Memory 93.6 1-Core 72.2 2-Core 108 60% 91.2 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 246 27% 213 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 2042) 1.5GB CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	6.61% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 7.1 6% 8.5 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 8 7% 9.27 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.61% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603A SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 133 131 137 129 133 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.8% Average	Read 213 Write 156 Mixed 180 SusWrite 135 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 32.4 4K Mixed 20.3 64% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 138 108% 149 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 84%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 160GB free Firmware: 603A SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 139 132 145 140 149 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 219 Write 160 Mixed 184 SusWrite 143 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 19.3 65% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 153 113% 148 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 80AD HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 02FE EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.2% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 10.7 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 9.7 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G73Jw Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jw

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	88x
Core i7 Q 840Intel $85Bench 56%, 1,339 samples	3x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	96x
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4x2GBUnknownBench 42%, 289 samples	20x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 41%, 455 samples	19x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 3x2GBHynixBench 35%, 234 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $228

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16