Gigabyte H410M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics65.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte H410M H  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210318
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 10 '21 at 07:27
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 89.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 255
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 711
77% 609 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.1% Good
Lighting 83.9
Reflection 83.2
Parallax 79.6
68% 82.2 fps
MRender 72.9
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 64.8
59% 72.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UK450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 11 3 2.9 25 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49% Average
Read 457
Write 388
Mixed 325
SusWrite 31.1
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 19.3
80% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 81.3
DQ Mixed 42.7
47% 80.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49%
Great: 59%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 109 108 108 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 108
Write 99.2
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 109
74% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KMKU8GF58-2666V Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 22.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 24.2
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H410M H Builds (Compare 3,282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte H410M H - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback