Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '17 at 17:42
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 158
2-Core 315
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 874
93% 743 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 105%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 191
Reflection 211
Parallax 204
156% 202 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 185
Splatting 130
121% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
705GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,810
Write 1,499
Mixed 1,366
416% 1,892 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 65
272% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 556
DQ Mixed 246
294% 516 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 315%
Great: 302%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 151
Write 138
Mixed 127
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.24
103% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 98%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
825GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 123
Write 120
Mixed 105
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.11
72% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2546 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 26.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 26.5
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $412

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback