Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCasper Casper Nirvana Notebook
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '17 at 17:04
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 85.7
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 134
60% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 999C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4170
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 6.77
Parallax 6.41
3% 5.68 fps
MRender 7.43
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.61
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62% Good
Read 104
Write 112
Mixed 102
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.2
66% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62%
Great: 63%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
91GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 21.1
Mixed 20.6
29% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.25
52% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F 1315 CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 17.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback