ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706LI_FX766LI

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706LI_FX766LI (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX706LI
Memory	18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210202
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '21 at 13:42
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Memory 92.1 1-Core 135 2-Core 261 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 739 72% 591 Pts	64-Core 724 45% 724 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile) 33,798 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Asus(1043 178F) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6663 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Lighting 59.7 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 56 49% 60.8 fps	MRender 65.4 Gravity 53.1 Splatting 51.4 46% 56.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 243GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2059 773 778 786 780 795 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	294% Outstanding	Read 2,593 Write 2,320 Mixed 1,752 SusWrite 995 428% 1,915 MB/s	4K Read 62.5 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 81.6 268% 91.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,166 DQ Write 897 DQ Mixed 1021 766% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 294% Great: 346%
Adata SP910SS 512GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 381GB free Firmware: 1.08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 406 406 408 407 408 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 455 Write 368 Mixed 256 SusWrite 407 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 30.8 111% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 74.4 122% 237 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 97%
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 17,430 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 424GB free Firmware: ECFK52.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 944 941 941 940 940 938 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 884 Write 946 Mixed 837 SusWrite 941 204% 902 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 61.5 220% 85.6 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 881 DQ Mixed 405 363% 528 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 185%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CB16GS2666.C8ET Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 24GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2667, 3200 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 21.8 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 34.6 SC Mixed 25.4 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706LI_FX766LI Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706LI_FX766LI

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	50x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	22x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	10x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	53x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	29x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	55x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	19x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	15x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	14x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback