MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B84
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '21 at 03:32
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 125
46% 79.1 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 199
20% 165 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 7B84) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 11.5
6% 8.47 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 5.9
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL500 512GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 198 205 9.8 44 324 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 350
Write 270
Mixed 246
SusWrite 174
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 16.5
73% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 37.1
71% 141 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905713-008.A00G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.1
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback