MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 18:15
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 257
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 759
79% 635 Pts
64-Core 764
47% 764 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.5% Above average
Lighting 72
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 68
59% 71.6 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 65.9
55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 210 82 82 81 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 451
Write 200
Mixed 344
SusWrite 152
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 33.4
137% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 197
173% 254 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 87%
PNY CS900 240 SSD 240GB
27GB free
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 37 37 35 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 377
Write 392
Mixed 347
SusWrite 83.6
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 36.4
133% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 185
166% 247 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 81%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
27GB free
Firmware: UF5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 95 116 107 97 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 411
Write 258
Mixed 269
SusWrite 141
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 17.9
74% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 85.4
DQ Mixed 44.9
49% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52%
Great: 56%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
26GB free
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 146 143 146 147 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 411
Write 87.5
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 175
41% 189 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 13.3
70% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 35.7
48% 86.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 56%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
22GB free
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 62 113 70 64 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 305
Write 256
Mixed 234
SusWrite 98.9
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 29.1
124% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 158
135% 195 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 42.5
MC Mixed 29.4
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 30.8
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 22,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $860
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback