MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 13:53
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 244
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 728
75% 605 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.2% Above average
Lighting 71.2
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 67.9
58% 71.2 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 67.1
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 194 79 80 82 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 432
Write 350
Mixed 328
SusWrite 146
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 33.8
137% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 196
172% 253 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%
PNY CS900 240 SSD 240GB
25GB free
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 6.6 49 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 394
Write 403
Mixed 352
SusWrite 69.3
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 37.5
134% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 185
165% 245 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 81%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
27GB free
Firmware: UF5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 115 98 98 119 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 417
Write 339
Mixed 290
SusWrite 148
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 18.5
76% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 34.7
43% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 56%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
26GB free
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 157 126 151 149 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 409
Write 346
Mixed 286
SusWrite 168
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 6.9
63% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 85.8
DQ Mixed 12.9
34% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 56%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
22GB free
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 62 113 78 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 309
Write 254
Mixed 238
SusWrite 97.1
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 29.4
126% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 154
134% 195 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 29.5
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 29
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 22,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $860
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback