MSI MPG Z490 GAMING CARBON WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive351% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C73
MotherboardMSI MPG Z490 GAMING CARBON WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 07:09
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 89.3
1-Core 155
2-Core 307
100% 184 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,193
104% 887 Pts
64-Core 1,674
104% 1,674 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 99.5
60% 79.4 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 49.6
51% 63.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
815GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2337 2242 1499 1505 1510 1505 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2590
Write 2,426
Mixed 1,918
SusWrite 1,766
488% 2,175 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 88.3
293% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1222
DQ Write 961
DQ Mixed 1,108
824% 1,097 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 351%
Great: 410%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
255GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 473 473 473 441 342 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 485
Mixed 455
SusWrite 443
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 58.1
192% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 355
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 123%
Great: 130%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
319GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 933 428 427 429 428 429 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,545
Write 1,743
Mixed 1,329
SusWrite 512
288% 1,283 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 71.4
250% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,255
DQ Write 1,005
DQ Mixed 990
779% 1,083 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 221%
Great: 237%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
972GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 209 215 215 216 217 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 124
Write 154
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 213
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 106%
WD Passport X 25BD 2TB
1TB free, PID 25bd
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 100
122% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 04CD F4-2400C15-8GVS 04CB DDR4 2400 2OZ 04CD F4-2400C15-8GVS 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 22.3
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 25.3
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z490 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7C73) Builds (Compare 4,583 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z490 GAMING CARBON WIFI - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,545
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback