Positivo Master C6200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo Master C6200  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-RIB360EC
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 18:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100T
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 222
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 412
55% 412 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
ASRock(1849 3E91) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 7.7
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CV8-CE256 256GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C180903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 201 190 245 257 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 481
Write 272
Mixed 239
SusWrite 220
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 37
132% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 176
159% 242 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P26KC4U1-BACS 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.2
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 11.7
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Master C6200 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo Master C6200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback