Microsoft Surface Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 62% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 06:53
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 33%
CPU Throttled 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m3-7Y30
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 81
37% 58.7 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 158
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Microsoft(1414 0026) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 5.7
0% 2.9 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 0.1
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Thnsn0128gtya TOSHIBA 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0AMS0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.9 4.6 4.4 11 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 295
Write 4.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 9.1
17% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 7.1
38% 9.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 56%
SDXC Card 128GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 45 21 13 8.7 5.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 83.5
Write 65.4
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 22
70% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.8
239% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 26%
Great: 45%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
11GB free, PID 3600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.8 5 5.2 5 5.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 5
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 5
10% 8.77 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNN8GTALAR-NUD 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 1.6
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Surface Pro Builds (Compare 2,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Microsoft Surface Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback