Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '21 at 19:52
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2420 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 57.2
2-Core 124
53% 86 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 381
38% 309 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Device(1B0A 90AA) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 375.95
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.92% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.92%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 250GB SSD
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303226
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1087 590 275 274 275 276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 976
Write 1,078
Mixed 905
SusWrite 462
192% 855 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 40.3
127% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 407
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 357
263% 347 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 122%
Great: 214%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
459GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 65.2
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 103
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 59%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
15GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 1.4 1.9 1.4 2.4 1.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20.7
Write 0.2
SusWrite 1.4
5% 7.43 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback