ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Inspiron 5577

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Dell Inspiron 5577 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0MVD5F
Memory	22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181201
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '21 at 16:56
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 113 2-Core 210 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 589 61% 492 Pts	64-Core 585 36% 585 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Dell(1028 07E1) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6647 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Lighting 31.3 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 31.6 26% 33.7 fps	MRender 34.8 Gravity 33.8 Splatting 20.4 23% 29.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 19,561 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 320GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 590 367 337 392 270 252 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	Read 684 Write 704 Mixed 684 SusWrite 368 137% 610 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 46.7 168% 62.7 MB/s	DQ Read 918 DQ Write 609 DQ Mixed 453 422% 660 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 170%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 466GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 300 302 302 298 297 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Read 412 Write 404 Mixed 360 SusWrite 321 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 75.7 4K Mixed 35.9 134% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 345 260% 349 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABD4162C HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.3% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 24.4 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 22.1 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Inspiron 5577 Builds (Compare 1,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 5577

CPU
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	818x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	813x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	974x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	657x

SSD
THNSNK128GVN8 M.2 2280 128GBToshibaBench 54%, 5,253 samples	266x
hynix SC311 SATA 128GBSKBench 65%, 20,313 samples	89x
X400 M.2 2280 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 12,357 samples	80x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBUnknownBench 37%, 41,676 samples	279x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 27,567 samples	145x
HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH 1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,962 samples	76x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback