Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive19% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 03 '21 at 02:43
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12% Very poor
Memory 17.3
1-Core 12.3
2-Core 43.4
14% 24.3 Pts
4-Core 38.8
8-Core 43
5% 40.9 Pts
64-Core 37.5
2% 37.5 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 12%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
ASRock(1849 03D6) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S SD S800 120G 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY2N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 23 14 21 12 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 169
Write 11.3
Mixed 121
SusWrite 23.5
18% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 6.7
29% 9.8 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 61.3
DQ Mixed 13.3
19% 34.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19%
Great: 50%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$150
231GB free
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 62 53 54 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 72.5
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 58.5
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.1% Terrible
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.7
SC Mixed 0.3
1% 0.4 GB/s
Latency 341
12% 341 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback