HP Elite 7500 Series MT

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Elite 7500 Series MT (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130318
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '21 at 00:37
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 72.2 1-Core 92.2 2-Core 173 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 290 41% 301 Pts	64-Core 295 18% 295 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.5% Above average	Lighting 63.8 Reflection 66.9 Parallax 61.1 52% 63.9 fps	MRender 61 Gravity 64.3 Splatting 60.5 51% 61.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
I-flashdisk K8 64GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1225G SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 128 126 130 123 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 383 Write 145 Mixed 188 SusWrite 128 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 21.2 56% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 148 126% 187 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 87%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 238GB free Firmware: X61170RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 340 377 371 358 359 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 353 Write 311 Mixed 305 SusWrite 349 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 24.1 77% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 286 232% 330 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 22,320 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	47.5% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.1 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 16 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 96.3 42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Elite 7500 Series MT Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: HP Elite 7500 Series MT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	280x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	102x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	60x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	48x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	39x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 4x4GBElpidaBench 55%, 449 samples	7x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	7x
99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 8,083 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16