Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191125
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 00:40
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 82.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 801
86% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,050
65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
PNY(196E 1350) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.2% Above average
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 77.1
Parallax 73.9
62% 75.8 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 72.7
Splatting 59.4
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 111 111 111 111 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 453
Mixed 374
SusWrite 146
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 54.9
183% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 205
154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 124%
Pcie SSD 512GB
388GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1923 696 480 492 491 485 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,520
Write 1,898
Mixed 1,528
SusWrite 761
322% 1,427 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 82.6
290% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,181
DQ Write 1,188
DQ Mixed 1,307
948% 1,226 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 250%
Great: 267%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
285GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 141 141 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 142
Write 91.8
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 140
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
281GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 96 95 96 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 97.8
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 94.5
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 59%
USB 3.0 MassStorage 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 103d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 133 128 138 131 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 117
Write 123
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 134
157% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 35
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $766
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback