Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191125
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 22:41
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 72.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 293
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 810
82% 668 Pts
64-Core 1,066
66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
PNY(196E 1350) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.1% Good
Lighting 78.5
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 74.5
64% 76.8 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 59.9
53% 64.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 498
Write 448
Mixed 365
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 57.2
190% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 204
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Pcie SSD 512GB
393GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1967 697 483 481 485 486 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,545
Write 1944
Mixed 1,523
SusWrite 766
326% 1,444 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 82
285% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,250
DQ Write 1,178
DQ Mixed 1,257
932% 1,228 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 251%
Great: 267%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
287GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 140 140 142 141 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 146
Write 111
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 140
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
283GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 94 95 96 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 95.4
Write 97.5
Mixed 82
SusWrite 94.3
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 59%
USB 3.0 MassStorage 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 103d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 131 127 138 132 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 84
SusWrite 133
158% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 25.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $766
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback