Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateMay 31 '21 at 23:27
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 63.2
38% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 282
25% 210 Pts
64-Core 894
55% 894 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
HP(103C 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 34
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 50.7
28% 42.2 fps
MRender 53.3
Gravity 43.5
Splatting 37
36% 44.6 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 221 223 210 212 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 407
Write 414
Mixed 326
SusWrite 237
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 21.2
4K Mixed 18.7
61% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 153
115% 154 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba-0098 9965516-031.A00LF 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.2
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback