Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime10.3 Days
Run DateMay 01 '21 at 08:31
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 46
1-Core 31.8
2-Core 63.7
30% 47.2 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 518
35% 330 Pts
64-Core 852
53% 852 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
HP(103C 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.4% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 42.6
Parallax 57.7
23% 42.9 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 43.5
Splatting 36.9
36% 44.5 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 264 264 254 195 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 436
Write 409
Mixed 366
SusWrite 255
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 21.8
70% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 147
110% 148 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba-0098 9965516-031.A00LF 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.3
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback