TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock X79 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140416
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 21:18
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 63
2-Core 103
50% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 351
37% 295 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 57.4%
 Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Asus(1043 8598)
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.9% Very good
Lighting 99
Reflection 108
Parallax 97.8
81% 102 fps
MRender 95.3
Gravity 96
Splatting 95.5
78% 95.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 79.9%
 Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 133 181 202 191 190 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.3% Good
Read 226
Write 213
Mixed 218
SusWrite 178
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 31.8
113% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 166
132% 184 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 63.3%
 Great: 102%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
898GB free
Firmware: 1D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 94 104 112 107 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 105
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 60.2%
 Great: 76%
ST500LM0 21-1KJ152 500GB
247GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 99 93 88 107 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.3% Average
Read 108
Write 113
Mixed 33
SusWrite 99.5
117% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 40.3%
 Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1866C10-8G F3-1866C10-8G F3-1866C10-8G CT102464BD160 CT102464BD160 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ CT102464BD160 F3-1866C10-8G 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.2% Good
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 26.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 7.3
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 62.2%
 Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X79 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme6 - $341

CPU
Core i7-4820KIntel  $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples65x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples59x
Core i7-3930KIntel  $195Bench 74%, 33,172 samples57x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples19x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples16x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples16x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples10x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung  $65Bench 96%, 217,115 samples10x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples8x
RAM
F3 DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 514 samples10x
F3 DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 42%, 1,467 samples8x
F3 DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 81%, 208 samples7x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $722
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback