Samsung RV413/RV513

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung RV413/RV513  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV413/RV413
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 29 '21 at 11:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 53.3
1-Core 19.9
2-Core 37.8
27% 37 Pts
4-Core 36.7
8-Core 37.4
5% 37.1 Pts
64-Core 36.2
2% 36.2 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Sanyo(144D C589) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 72 47 85 14 15 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.5% Very poor
Read 121
Write 80.2
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 68.3
19% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 7.6
28% 9.47 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 14.1
11% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown E30801S Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 5.2
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 13%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV413/RV513 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV413/RV513

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback