Samsung RV413/RV513

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive8.68% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung RV413/RV513  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV413/RV413
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '20 at 15:54
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Memory 48
1-Core 11.8
2-Core 20.9
21% 26.9 Pts
4-Core 19.5
8-Core 24.1
3% 21.8 Pts
64-Core 29.6
2% 29.6 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Sanyo(144D C589) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.41
1% 1.24 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.32 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 83 39 54 60 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.68% Terrible
Read 75.8
Write 75.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 51.9
14% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 2.4
8% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 8.68%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown E30801S Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.73 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 13%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV413/RV513 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV413/RV513

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback