Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite L855 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121030
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	May 29 '21 at 02:30
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 88.5 2-Core 179 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 437 46% 368 Pts	64-Core 441 27% 441 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB22) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.8% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 5.2 5% 5.97 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 5.2 4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.8% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 37 75 55 76 32 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 459 Write 368 Mixed 396 SusWrite 72.4 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 24.9 101% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 47.6 102% 205 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 M471B5273CM0-CK0 8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 16.4 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	105x
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples	84x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	4x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	13x
M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,461 samples	11x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	10x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $448