Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '21 at 21:43
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 197
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 622
56% 474 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.2% Average
Lighting 61
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 50.6
50% 56.7 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 53.2
Splatting 47.6
39% 47.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GMTS820S 120GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 128 38 25 17 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 491
Write 374
Mixed 371
SusWrite 69.1
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 22.6
109% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 35.7
67% 132 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB
117GB free
Firmware: MS1OA650
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 112 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 133
Write 139
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 111
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-120.A00G 9905678-173.A00G 16GB
3133, 3133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 30.5
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 26.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $338
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback