HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results


Gaming 123% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 115% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8437
Memory	25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 28 '21 at 19:46
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$265 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	99% Outstanding	Memory 89.8 1-Core 145 2-Core 253 92% 163 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 1,056 98% 818 Pts	64-Core 1,070 66% 1,070 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$391 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% HP(103C 8552) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 165 Reflection 162 Parallax 164 134% 164 fps	MRender 180 Gravity 145 Splatting 121 118% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33 44,050 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 32 64 90 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 1,414 Write 71.5 Mixed 118 SusWrite 63.2 88% 417 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 37.6 120% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 428 DQ Write 49.2 DQ Mixed 86.6 102% 188 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 193%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OAC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 173 172 173 175 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 150 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 172 94% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 2x16GB 2,002 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 27.9 90% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 33.4 SC Mixed 24.3 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	1,249x
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	722x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	590x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	743x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	360x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	292x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	356x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	173x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $60Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	158x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	399x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	222x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	180x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $366

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16