Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory360.1 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 28 '21 at 07:49
Run Duration368 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.1% Very good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 215
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 848
73% 627 Pts
64-Core 2,977
184% 2,977 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
137% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 157
Parallax 177
163% 178 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 158
Splatting 98.2
113% 144 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 137%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 178 165 64 66 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,574
Write 258
Mixed 405
SusWrite 131
128% 592 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 47.1
178% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 253
204% 288 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 139%
Great: 257%
MS1PC5ED3ORA3.2T 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: KPYA7R3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1776 1754 1762 1749 1752 1742 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 1,657
Write 1,708
Mixed 1,002
SusWrite 1,756
345% 1,530 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 59.1
214% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 925
DQ Write 700
DQ Mixed 829
616% 818 MB/s
Poor: 171%
This bench: 276%
Great: 312%
MS1PC5ED3ORA3.2T 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: KPYA7R3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1735 1700 1702 1715 1715 1721 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 1,951
Write 1,817
Mixed 1,376
SusWrite 1,715
386% 1,715 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 58.7
209% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 929
DQ Write 681
DQ Mixed 823
610% 811 MB/s
Poor: 171%
This bench: 283%
Great: 312%
7335940:ICDPC2DD2ORA6.4T 6.5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: QDV1RE14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1756 1764 1762 1769 1779 1755 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,027
Write 1,241
Mixed 870
SusWrite 1,764
278% 1,225 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 33
170% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 921
691% 923 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 240%
Great: 252%
Intel SSDPE2KX080T8 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: VDV10170
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2043 2430 2398 2412 2402 2414 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 1,278
Write 1,647
Mixed 1,362
SusWrite 2,350
377% 1,659 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 44.8
202% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 982
DQ Write 878
DQ Mixed 927
696% 929 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 296%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7MFR4N-UH 12x31.9GB
12 of 12 slots used
383GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
156% Outstanding
MC Read 64.1
MC Write 74.9
MC Mixed 60.2
190% 66.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 156%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback