ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Pavilion Gaming Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Notebook (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 80A9
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160307
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '17 at 22:38
Run Duration	89 Seconds
Run User	KEN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 108 2-Core 206 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 546 56% 454 Pts	64-Core 549 34% 549 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 80A9) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4542 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	2.25% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.54 Parallax 2.22 2% 2.69 fps	MRender 3.52 Gravity 2 Splatting 4.87 3% 3.46 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.25% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Marshal MAL2750SA-T54 750GB 275 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 572GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX101U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1941 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 615 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 116 (0A) Spinup retry count 112 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 95 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 233 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1233 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 223339151404 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 102 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 179 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	44.4% Average	Read 80.1 Write 74.6 Mixed 76.6 58% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.21 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HXMSH4GS03A1F1CL16 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.7% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 15.7 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 17.1 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Pavilion Gaming Notebook Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Notebook

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	535x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	168x
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	6x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	472x
GTX 950MNvidiaBench 14%, 38,813 samples	231x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	5x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 46%, 3,641 samples	125x
IM2S3138E-128GM-B 128GBBench 65%, 3,316 samples	28x
WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TBWDCBench 96%, 39,874 samples	17x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	77x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	73x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	72x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback