TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI 870-G45 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 870-G45 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '21 at 18:43
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 91.6
48% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 175
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 56.3%
 Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.4%
 Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 157 172 177 176 182 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.5% Above average
Read 226
Write 186
Mixed 187
SusWrite 173
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 26
89% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 39.7
DQ Mixed 88.6
67% 93.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 51.5%
 Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
993GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 106 111 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 110
Write 98.7
Mixed 61
SusWrite 109
69% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 62.7%
 Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
93GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 15.9
Mixed 18
SusWrite 26.6
16% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 15.9%
 Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 23%
 Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 870-G45 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870-G45 (MS-7599)

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD  $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples4x
Athlon II X4 640AMD  $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples3x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples3x
GPU
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples2x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples2x
HD 7870AMD  $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples2x
SSD
MX100 128GBCrucial  $74Bench 76%, 9,892 samples2x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples2x
VERTEX2 50GBOCZBench 34%, 332 samples1x
RAM
F3-1600C10-8GAO000 F3-1600C10-8GAO000 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 31 samples2x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 3x4GBMicronBench 42%, 301 samples1x
99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 6,486 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback