Acer Aspire A315-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-42  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Sleepy_PK
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '21 at 01:52
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 36.6
2-Core 97.1
39% 64.7 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 107
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Acer(1025 134D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.3
4% 6.9 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 11.2
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen01sm21ar256itnvme 256GB 256GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 340 410 316 341 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 379
Write 859
Mixed 548
SusWrite 329
120% 529 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 24
136% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 389
DQ Mixed 115
158% 288 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 186%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
487GB free
Firmware: ACM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 111 111 111 110 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 86.3
Write 104
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 110
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
161% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4R4GS24A8R Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 8GB
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 20.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 18.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-42 Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback