Toshiba SATELLITE C855-1R6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C855-1R6  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PLCSF8
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120924
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 25 '21 at 16:50
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 111
56% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 199
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 57%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$60
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 106 72 91 95 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 406
Write 350
Mixed 118
SusWrite 106
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 6.3
41% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 71.2
DQ Mixed 22.1
35% 68 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 SUPERTALENT02 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C855-1R6 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C855-1R6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback