ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP hp workstation xw8200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP hp workstation xw8200 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 08B4h
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2.00098 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20060531
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '21 at 11:27
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.40GHz 20 User benchmarks, average bench 32% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Memory 55.8 1-Core 27.4 2-Core 59.8 32% 47.7 Pts	4-Core 54.1 8-Core 54.5 7% 54.3 Pts	64-Core 55.3 3% 55.3 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	6% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 9.6 Parallax 4.9 6% 7.17 fps	MRender 9.7 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 7 7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST373455LW 73GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 66 69 96 97 98 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 106 Write 99.8 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 84.3 66% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.3 138% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 55%
Donkey 1TB 931GB free Firmware: 0.1. SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 105 107 155 155 164 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	92.3% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 130 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 138 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.93 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 35GB 2,113 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 1024, 1024, 33792 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.7% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.03 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 19%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical hp workstation xw8200 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP hp workstation xw8200

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz1stBench 31%, 33 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz1stBench 31%, 48 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.80GHz1stBench 33%, 11 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	1x
GeForce 9800 GTXNvidiaBench 8%, 3,983 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
CV3-CE128-11 SATA 128GBLiteonBench 68%, 643 samples	1x

RAM
37GBUnknownBench 15%, 3,950 samples	1x
35GBUnknownBench 13%, 2,113 samples	1x
45GBUnknownBench 22%, 415 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback