Acer Nitro AN517-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN517-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Karoq_CMS
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200621
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 25 '21 at 09:17
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 259
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 804
78% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1440) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2705 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.2% Good
Lighting 83.6
Reflection 95.4
Parallax 86.9
68% 88.6 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 79.3
Splatting 80.9
71% 88.4 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1014 1TB
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1399 838 839 833 829 869 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 951
Write 1,748
Mixed 1,200
SusWrite 935
274% 1,209 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 58.2
192% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 949
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 853
638% 853 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 193%
Great: 273%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.7% Above average
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 19.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 61.1
65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN517-52 Builds (Compare 3,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN517-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback