Asus P7P55-M

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P7P55-M (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110103
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '21 at 20:50
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 93.5 1-Core 99 2-Core 198 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 392 52% 392 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1363) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.3% Average	Lighting 52.2 Reflection 56.2 Parallax 51.6 42% 53.3 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 50.1 Splatting 45.8 42% 52 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB 26,886 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 114 92 72 91 30 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.5% Below average	Read 150 Write 85.2 Mixed 106 SusWrite 89.5 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 16.8 62% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 16.1 DQ Mixed 18.9 15% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 94%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB 3,461 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 60GB free Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 217 129 62 81 71 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.4% Average	Read 237 Write 124 Mixed 158 SusWrite 126 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 26 93% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 40.4 DQ Mixed 27.3 22% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	47.4% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 15.3 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 14.8 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55-M Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7P55-M

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	65x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	52x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	39x

GPU
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	19x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	10x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	87x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	69x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16